Can we use AI on privileged or confidential documents?+
That is your call, but the technology should not be what stops it. The gateway runs in your own Azure tenant in an EU region, the models are reached through EU data zones and the data is not used for training. Permissions follow the role, and iManage keeps its own permissions and ethical walls when the agent reads from it. Every call is logged, so you can show who asked about which matter.
Does the AI make up case law?+
A language model answering from memory can, which is why the connections exist. When the agent pulls from Westlaw through CoCounsel, from statute text or from EUR-Lex, the answer rests on the actual source and shows where it is, so the lawyer can check. We do not promise a model is never wrong. The setup makes it easy to see when it is, and a lawyer always makes the call.
Can we connect Karnov and JUNO?+
Karnov and JUNO have AI features of their own inside their services, and we build the connection to the gateway. In the meantime the team reaches Swedish statute text through the Riksdag's open data and EU law through EUR-Lex, both via community servers that we review before they are approved.
Which contract and e-signing tools can we connect?+
Scrive has its own server with BankID signing, DocuSign has its in beta, and Ironclad offers read-only contract search with its own EU endpoint. Juro has its own server too. Oneflow and Dropbox Sign are reached through community servers we review, and for Penneo and Assently we build the connection.
Is this the same thing as Legora or Harvey?+
No. Legora and Harvey are AI products built for lawyers. Walma is the platform that gives the whole company the models and the connections, with shared governance and a log, and the legal team is one department on it. If you already have a legal AI tool it can stay, and the gateway governs the rest of the organisation's AI use, including the contracts and documents the lawyers themselves have to keep track of.